Sunday, September 30, 2007

India urged to take a stand on Myanmar

Though its not from Nepal and for Nepal but we support democratic struggle anywhere in the world. But some quaters remain quite. They claim to be democratic nation and try to interfare in other countries internal matters but in some cases they don't, isn't it diplomacy?

New Delhi: Hundreds of refugees from Myanmar on Friday took out a march in New Delhi to protest against the military crackdown on pro-democracy protesters in the neighbouring country and sought India's intervention in stopping the bloodshed. The protesters, including a large number of women and children, carried posters and photographs of jailed pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi and shouted slogans against Myanmar's ruling junta.
"The movement for restoration of democracy in Myanmar needs the solidarity of people across the globe," Neng Boi, a spokesperson for the refugees, told reporters after the peaceful march.
After the September 26 crackdown in Rangoon, India's external affairs ministry gave a guarded statement earlier this week, expressing concern over the recent turmoil in Myanmar at a time when people all over the globe are condemning the brutal attacks on the protesting monks.
"As a close and friendly neighbour, India hopes to see a peaceful, stable and prosperous Myanmar, where all sections of people will be included in a broad-based process of national reconciliation and political reform," an Indian foreign office statement had said.
The Myanmar refugees are disappointed with India's lukewarm response to the developments in their homeland.
"It is indeed shocking to find one of the world's largest democracies adopting a nuanced approach although we still expect India to take a bold stand," said Min Maung, an exiled Burmese student leader, who is now a correspondent for the BBS (Burmese Service) in New Delhi. He pointed out that even Communist China had come down heavily on the military crackdown on the pro-democracy movement.
New Delhi's diplomatic tightrope walking on the issue has been criticised by civil rights activists in India as well. "We cannot have democracy at home and support military tyrants in the neighbourhood. India must do all it can for the restoration of democracy in Burma," said Nandita Haksar, a prominent human rights lawyer.
Asian Centre for Human Rights, a New Delhi-based rights body, came out with an official statement that the Burmese junta deserved more denigration and the UN must not remain a mute spectator to the recent developments in Burma.
In separate statements, a group of Parliamentarians and religious leaders condemned the violence unleashed by the Myanmar government on protestors there and asked them to immediately release political prisoners, including Suu Kyi.
Political observers said India's cautious approach was dictated by its economic and strategic interests but conceded that this was bound to evoke criticism.
Until the mid-1990s, India was openly supporting pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi. It was only in 2004 that New Delhi changed track and welcomed military strongman Gen Than Shwe during his visit to the Indian capital.
India invited criticism from international communities recently when Petroleum Minister Murli Deora visited Myanmar on September 23 — the day that there were massive protests against the junta in the country — and signed three bilateral agreements for oil exploration.
India's Foreign Minister Pranab Mukherjee also found himself in an awkward position during an interactive session with the diplomats and intellectuals in Bangkok a week earlier when he was asked what India was doing to restore democracy in Burma. Mukherjee reiterated New Delhi's foreign policy of "non-interference in the internal matters of any country."
(By Sify Correspondent Saturday, 29 September , 2007, 19:21)

Friday, September 21, 2007

Two jokers in Nepali politics

In current Nepali politics there are two prominent jockers; staright from the pack of cards. Though they both differ in ideology, cast, class and community. They have striking similarities.

They both are mentally ill. They cannot see anything, feel anything and accept anything. They are a remote operated robots and have the same remote control. They both blame unidentified groups for everything that is happening and happens.

Ask one of them about the petrol shortage, he claims that the unidentified groups are selling Nepali petrol in the borders and sending him hefty cheques. He has no clue why there is queue in Kathmandu for petrol. Enough petrol has been sent by the Indian Oil Corporation but where does that all oil leaks, he doesnot know. He even doesnot know who changed the Goyal and sent Jha as a director (?) in Nepal Oil Corporation. Why is Goyal changed, he doesnot know that either. He is a supply minister, a national jocker, who is interrested only in money-supply in his bank accounts.
He is supposed to be a leader of Terai and he doesnot know who are killing his own voters in Kapilvastu. He claims that unidentified groups killed people in hundreds in Kapilvastu.

Another jocker is yet more humourous. He is supposed to be the home minister. But he doesnot know who blasted bombs in Kathmandu and killed three. Who killed more than 100 people in Kapilvastu. Unidentified groups - is all his answers.

I suggest the government to sent these jockers to mental assylum. But they should be ministers, all the way: The ministers of mentally retartded.
Google